On basis of our investigation, we definitely have proven that two cornerstones of modern physics: the theory of relativity and that of Schroedinger-Heisenberg are incorrect. Both were created on the basis of false postulates and hypotheses and therefore do not adequately reflect the real physical world. Cognizant of the fact that the world that surrounds us is based on a Newtonian representation of space and time, a true physical representation of investigated occurances and adherence to common sense, allowed us to develop a theory that solves all problems. In contrast to our theory, which provides exact and reliable results, current theories do not reflect reality and accounts based on them are distorted.

The followers of modern physics think that a new era of science had begun with the birth of the theory of relativity. It created a revolution in physics and resulted in revisions to classical physics. The real medium – ether was banished from the universe and empty space was united with time in a common four-dimensional continuum. The real world had become fantastic. According to relativistic theory, as the velocity of a body approached the velocity of light, its energy and mass would become limitless, its size would be null and time would stop. These paradoxical conclusions are evidence of a short life for current theories. True scientific discovers must triumph over fantasies.

The theory of relativity emerged with the unsuccessful attempts to find adequate interpretations of the results of Fizeau and Michelson’s experiments and the phenomenon of star aberration. Our research has demonstrated that ether is traversed by moving bodies, including Earth’s atmosphere. This conclusion has been made on the basis of critical analysis of the four most typical experiments. We had explained Fizeau’s and, Michelson’s experiments, the Sagnac effect and star aberration by reasoning from the existence of a world medium – ether. Scientists committed to relativity theory, have made a major error in banishing the ether. They preferred a world of fantasies, where judgments cannot be made. If they explained the Michelson’s experiment through the use of a propagating medium, no ad hoc theories would have been required. This oversight arrested the development of physics for a hundred years.

Lets look at an example to demonstrate the errors implicit in the theory of relativity. The relativistic formula of kinetic energy is

E_k=, (1)

where m – mass, V – its velocity, c – the velocity of light. This formula is used for particles that are accelerated in accelerators, but is considered true for other possible cases. This is erroneous. The force from which the electric field in the accelerator operates on a particle had been taken to equal:

F= (2)

where t – time. According this expression, in the process of increasing the particle velocity, the force operating on it is continuously increasing. As the particle approaches light speed, the force approaches infinity. However, this is contradicted by the universally recognized fact of the finiteness of the interaction. According to this, the force operating on the particle, or vise versa, has to approach zero. From this, it follows that equations (1) and (2) are incorrect and cannot be used in accelerator calculations.

Equation (2) correctly describes dependence of the force operating on an atomic electron on the particle velocity. And at the same time it is necessary to have in view that it is not the electron mass that is increasing, but the velocity itself. As shown in work [1],

V^′=.

Taking this into consideration, the energy in the atom will be [1]

E_k = (3)

Comparing formulae (1) and (3), we are certain that the use of formula (1) is invalid. Energy cannot be converted to mass and vise versa. Definitions such as rest energy and total energy, rest mass and relativistic mass are senseless and do not represent reality.

It is possible to develop a proper formula for the kinetic energy of a particle moving in an accelerator. The higher the velocity of a particle, the lower the force of the electromagnetic field acting on the particle:

F= =.

Taking into account the effect of motion, the expression for the kinetic energy of a particle in an accelerator is,

E_k=, (4)

Where x is the length of the distance travelled by the accelerated particle. As the particle velocity approaces that of light, the kinetic energy will approach a value, mC²/2, and not infinity, as as identified in formula (1).

An important example exists in the creation of powerful accelerators of charged particles. The cost of such accelerators is very large, but the increase in particle energy is very small Therefore it is not expedient to build them. The accelerator in Serpuhov can accelerate protons to a velocity of 0,999995 C, and the accelerator in Batavia Illinois, USA, can accelerate protons to a velocity of 0,999998C[2]. If we use the formulae of relativity, the Serpuhov accelerator provides protons with an energy equal to 76 GeV, and the Batavia accelerator – 500 GeV. According our formula (4), protons in Serpuhov accelerator acquire an energy of 469,089 MeV, and in the Batavia accelerator – 469,134 MeV. In this case, the cost of building and maintenance of the Batavia accelerator is incommensurably more than the Serpuhov, but the additional energy received by the protons, is only 45 keV.

The erroneous ideas of relativity theory stimulated development of new ideas that were equally erroneous. In 1923, Compton had proven that X-rays consist of particles – corpuscles, and De Broglie had made the assumption that material particles, as radiation, had a dual character. Thus, the corpuscular-wave dualism had been formulated and had eliminated the definition between particles and waves. But this is absurd. Particles and waves are conflicting concepts which move one more step away from reality. In the real world, light is radiating by atoms as photons, which are spiral waves traveling in an ether medium with the speed of light. Under its movement a photon progressively energizes newer and newer medium volumes, but does not carry the medium. A particle, unlike a wave, in its movement carries all substance which is contained in its dimensions. A particle cannot become a wave.

According to quantum physics, the energy of a photon is equal to:

where m_ph is the photon mass. The electron energy in any circular orbit in an atom is evaluated by formula[1]:

E=, (6)

where m is the electron mass, V’ is its velocity with the movement effect, 1+m/M, M is the nuclear mass. For removing an electron from an atom, a photon needs a mass of

m_ph = .

The last formula allows us to conclude that according quantum physics, the photon mass depends on the electron velocity in the atom. The E=m_phc² formula for photons is therefore wrong. In reality, photon energy is calculated by formula [1]

E=, (7)

where M_ph is the photon mass, under that conditionally exists an ether mass of small volume, which is perturbated by a quantum of energy radiated by the atom; V_max is the amplitude velocity of the energized ether. Comparing equations (6) and (7) taking into account that amplitude velocity is equal to the velocity of an electron in an atom, we derive,

M_ph=m,

Therefore, the photon mass is equal to the electron mass independent of its energy.

Quantum mechanics is the basis of modern atomic physics. Bohr had discovered the quantum behaviour of atomic structure. He and Sommerfield had proven Rutherford’s planetary atom model, but Schroedinger and Geienberg are presumed the creators of the true theory of atoms. Currently, atoms are describing by very complex wave equations formulated by Schroedinger in 1926. The de Broglie hypothesis, which identifies the electron as a wave, is its basis. This is an absurd hypothesis and as a result, Schroedinger’s equation does not adequately describe real atomic processes.

One of main aspects of quantum physics is the principle of indeterminacy. This principle must be considered unscientific. On the one hand,, it established a limit to the knowledge of the microcosm. On the other, it excuses our lack of knowledge of its structure. According to its principles, it is impossible to apply the notion of an electron path in an atom, because it’s impossible specify coordinates and electron velocity at the same time. The electron, which is in a steady state in the hydrogen atom, can appear in any point of a sphere with r = 5.29•10^-11 m, i.e. it is subordinate to Coulomb's law. We can account with a great accuracy all parameters of any orbit of electron in hydrogen atom in at any point in time. We can define with the same accuracy, the electron coordinates and its velocity as our work [1] indicates. Our computations prove that Heisenberg’s principle of indeterminacy is false.

This principle plays a large role in atomic and high-energy physics. Electron energy levels and expectancy of them being at different points in an atom at a fixed instant of time can be calculated with Schroedinger’s equation, but the principle of indeterminacy undermines any accurate assessment. The calculations provide an inaccurate notion of atom structure. The largest deviations from reality are observed in high-energy physics. It is assumed that the theory of relativity and the principle of indeterminacy substantiate the theory of elementary particles and the fact of their existance. Energies and masses of particles under their formulation substantiate the possibility of the existence of virtual and real particles. If state that these theories erroneous, then the reality of existence of the majority of elementary particles is put in doubt. In work [1], we prove that regarding the universe accessible to us, there are two types of elementary particles - electrons and protons. We can develop a design procedure for orbital parameters of complex atoms on the known values of ionization potentials, which can be calculated theoretically.

(8)

By this formula, we can find the orbital velocities of electrons without the effect of motion, and by formula (3) – values of ionization potentials with the effect of motion. In formula (8) V_n-1, V_n and V_n+1 are orbital velocities of the three nearest ions. Those ions have an equal number of electrons. V_n is the orbital velocity of the electron in a Bohr orbit in the hydrogen atom. Calculated values of ionization potentials for first 36 elements of the Mendeleev Table are demonstrated in work [1]. In such cases, any atom can be theoretically calculated.

1911 marked the birth of atomic physics with Rutherford’s discovery of the atomic nucleus. Originally, scientists developed electron-proton model of the nucleus, but after the discovery of the neutron, the proton-neutron model was accepted. According to it, electrons are not present in the nucleus and the neutron is an elementary particle. Electron radiation by a radioactive nucleus is identified with radiation of light quanta. Similar to a quantum of light, an electron is born during nuclear transformations. Development of the physics of elementary particles went hand-in-hand with the problems of nuclear physics. While drawing a correct inference about the proton-neutron structure of the nucleus, a theoretical error was committed in accepting a neutron for an elementary particle. To explain interactions between nucleons in the nucleus, it was necessary to add a specific quantum-mechanical concept - exchange forces, and to begin searching for new elementary particles which meet the requirements of these forces.

The important characteristic of a nucleus is its mass. According to the theory of relativity, the mass of a particle is a variable. It depends on any form of energy, including potential. Exact measurements of the mass of nuclei show that their mass always is less than sum of masses of protons and the neutrons, which are included in their structure. Difference between nuclear mass and the sum of nuclei is called the mass defect, and the value is called the binding energy. Ion masses are measuring with a mass spectrometer. The masses of atoms resulted in look-up tables which are developed by the addition of measured ion and electron masses.

The reason for the occurrence of the mass defect is due to an erroneous assumption, that charges of ions are equal or multiples of an elementary charge. Only the hydrogen ion has a multiple charge – other ions do not display this characteristic. An electron can shield a single nuclear charge only in the case where its charge would be evenly distributed around a nucleus on a spherical surface. The electron cannot fully isolate a single nuclear charge because it is in orbit and its charge is concentrated for all practical purposes, in a point. Because particle masses are constants, it is possible to define effective charge numbers, (and not masses of atoms and molecules) with help of mass spectrometry.

Atoms consist of a positive nucleus and orbiting electrons. The neutron structure is similar to an atom, although the electron has fewer orbits and higher velocity. So, we could say that the nucleus consists of protons and electrons. Electrons perform complex movements and hold protons in the nucleus. Protons can only oscillate. The quantity of protons in a nucleus is equal to its mass quantity. The quantity of protons in the nucleus is greater than the quantity of electrons. The excess is equal to the quantity of electrons in atomic orbits, and correspond to the electron number. As protons and electron masses are constants and the quantity of electrons in an atom is equal to the quantity of protons, so masses of all atoms are multiples of hydrogen’s atomic mass. As a result, it is advisable to use 1,673534038kg for the atomic mass unit. The proton mass is then, a.u.m., the neutron mass is, a.u.m. and the electron mass is a.u.m.

The universe displays an astonishing variety which was created with the help of only two types of elementary particles – the electron and proton. The ether which fills space undoubtedly consists of electrons and protons. We have developed the electron-proton model of the world, which explains all its properties. The majority of scientists assumed very little density in creating an ether theory. So, they tried to explain why ether does not react to rapid movement of substances. But our investigations show that ether has a very high density compared to the density of liquids and solids and exceeds the gas density by hundreds of times. Parodoxically, the ether gas with high density is an extremely rareified substance. This can be determined by making simple calculations. According our model, the structure of ether is the same as that of the universe. As in the macrocosm, the distances between objects in the ether (microcosm) exceed their sizes by a dozen million times. Therefore, the probability of a collision between electrons and protons is as small as the probability of the collision of macrocosmic bodies in space.

The described ether model assumes the existance of a thinner medium that transfers electric and gravitational interactions. Lets call this medium sub-ether. Light and X-rays cannot travel in this medium. Acoustic waves can travel in solids, liquids and gas, but not in sub-ether. Sub-ether is a medium through which force interactions are transferred from charged substances to others with the speed of light in that radiations can travel with wave-length less than .

REFERENCE: