Submissions | Add Your Comments | Physics Site Links | Home Page |
| Email: Messrs. Sukhorukov |

Aether and Ethereal waves Sukhоrukov G.I.,Sukhоrukov R.G.
Modern physics began at the start of the 20th century. After unsuccessful attempts to explain experiments, scientist came to the conclusion that at extreme velocities, the laws of classical physics did not apply. Thus began an intensive exploration of new ways of understanding natural phenomena. The result managed to overcome the crisis, but at the price of greater victims. The only way out was to ignore some postulates – so we had to indiscriminately abandon Newton’s concept of space and time, and clearly demonstrative physical models as well as the principle of common sense. Physics became the exclusive realm of the mathematicians with physical processes described through abstract theories that are based on erroneous postulates and hypotheses. This applies in all respects to electromagnetic wave theory.
In excluding the privileged reference system in relativistic theory, Einstein abandoned the aether. However such an approach to this problem is doomed to failure, because it is not possible to abandon reality and the existing ambience. Notwithstanding, the boundless expanse of the universe is filled with a world ambience – the aether. The whole information surrounding our world gives us ethereal waves (light, x-ray, radiowaves and so on). The determination of the wave nature of these radiations precludes any doubts about the validity of the existence of the aether. The wave process involves the transportation of energy, which is impossible without a material carrier. The etherial waves come to us both from the most distant areas of the universe and from the depths of atoms and their nuclei. Consequently, the aether permeates both the macro- and microcosm.
We have developed electron-protonic model of the aether, which is consistent with its character. Most scientist ascribe a very small density to the aether in order to explain why the resistance to a moving body is not apparent. Our studies have shown that the aether has a very high density commensurable with the density of fluids and rigid bodies exceeding gases by hundreds of times. In order to avoid paradox, we posit that the aether, having a high density, is an instaneously discharged substance. This greatly simplifies the calculations [1].
According to our model, the structure of the aether is like the structure of the universe. Both the universe and the aether are built on the same principle. In the universe (in macrocosm), as in the aether (in microcosm), the distances between bodies exceed their sizes by a million times. In the aether, the probability of electron collisions with protons is as small, as the probability of the collision of celestial bodies. In the unit of volume of the aether the number of protons is equal to the number of electrons. That is why the aether is a neutral ambience – dielectric. Maxwell also considered that aether consists of discharged particles, but he did not identify what these particles were of themselves.
De Lambert has proven theoretically that an ideal incondensable liquid does not resist a body moving at a constant velocity rectilineally or on a circumference. This law is exactly executed under the orbital motion of celestial bodies and electrons in atoms. The ability of the aether not to resist the moving bodies, is conditioned by its structure. The ambience does not offer resistance to the motion of charged bodies only in the case if it consists of discharged particles. So for instance, if protons move in the aether the counter positive particles will repulse it, while negative ones will attract with the same power. The power of repulsion will be compensated by the power of attraction. Since, any body consists of electron and protons, the aether also does not offer resistance to their uniform motion.
The motion of charged bodies influences the efficiency of their interaction. When the charged bodies are in proximity, the motion intensifies the efficiency of their interaction but on the contrary when they are distant, the motion weakens their efficiency. However the effect of the motion does not influence the ability of the aether not to prevent the bodies from moving at the constant velocity. The reinforcement or weakening of the interaction between the same charges of the moving bodies and the aether is compensated by reinforcement or weakening of the interaction between different charges.
If the aether consisted of neutral particles, its properties would not be proven by the experiments. Such an aether would not resist bodies moving at a constant velocity. The counter particles of the aether would send a greater impulse to the body than those passing and as a result the velocity of the moving body in reference to the aether would continuously decrease. In some period of time the motion of the body would stop.
The principle of de Lambert is not executed if the motion of the bodies is accelerated. The power of itertia appears to influence all the particles of the moving body and the aether like the power of gravity. Being in a moving with acceleration vehicle we can judge the value of this power. The large value, with which the aether influences us, proves it has a high density.
The described model of the aether supposes the existence of a finer ambience, through which electric and gravitational interactions are sent. Let us call this ambience a subether. Light and x-ray waves can not spread in this ambience. As acoustic waves can spread in hard, fluid and gaseous substances, but can not spread in airwaves, so ethereal waves can spread in electro-protonic aether, but not in subether. Subether is an ambience through which the power of interaction from one charged body to others are sent at the speed of light and in which the radiations with wavelength less 10-11 m can spread. There are no de Broglie waves in nature. There are aether and subaether waves.
Electron-protonic aether should be considered incondensable, since the significant distances between its particle causes large changes in the electric field voltage. At the same time there are no obstacles to shift deformation. This can explain that fact that light waves are transverse. In view of the incompressibility of the aether, the excitation of longitudal waves in it is impossible.
Planck and Einstein have considered that wave radiation is emitted by the atom discretely and spreads in space in the form of small bundle of energy. These bundles of energy were named light quanta or photons. Having abandoned the aether, Einstein had to consider the photons to be a particle, possessing wave properties. Because of this, in experiments of Davisson and Germer the diffraction of electronic waves had to be explained with the help of the wave properties of electrons themselves. Thus, an inconsistent philosophical notion was incorporated in physics - corpuscular-wave dualism.
Corpuscular-wave dualism has buried the differences between particle and waves. Any object of the microcosm (electron, photon, neutron and so on) can behave either as a particle or as a wave. So one more step from reality was made. In reality, the photon presents itself as a spiral wave, spreading in the ambience of the aether at the speed of light. While the moving photon consecutively influences new sections of the ambience, it does not carry away the ambience itself. A particle, unlike a wave, while moving carries away all substances inncluded in its volume. The particle, in no case can become a wave.
According to Bohr is necessary to add the energy to transform an electron in atom from the stationary condition K1 into the stationary condition K2
hνф
= Е1-Е2, (1)where h
- a constant Plank, νф - a frequency of the photon, Е1, Е2 - accordingly the energy of the electron in the first and second stationary condition.It is possible to convert the formula of Bohr as follows
![]()
(2)
where
- a wavelength, C - a velocity of the light, e - a charge of the electron, rн - Bohr radius,
=1+m/м, m - a mass of the electron, M – weight of atom, z1, z2 - charge numbers of the nucleus, the electron being in the first and second stationary conditions. The primed and unprimed letters mark the values, regarding and disregarding the effect of the motion. The value
R
=e2С·10-7/2hrн=1,097314784× 107 m-1 –the Rydberg constant, has one and the same value in all atoms. So this formula (2) will take the following form
(3)
If the lengths of the waves are known when radiated by the atom from infinity to the orbits of the first and the second stationary condition, it is possible to write formula (3) in this manner:
![]()
thence we find,
![]()
νф = νф2 - νф
1,where the letters ν and T with index "ф" are the primed frequencies and periods of the radiated waves (the photons).
To present the processes, occurring in an atom during the radiation of a photon, we can express the values, in reference to the photon, through values, in reference to the atom. Having placed in formula (2) the values E1 and E2, expressed through orbital velocities of electrons in atom, we have,
(4)
but if instead of z1', z2' we present their values expressed through radiuses of circular orbits we shall get the following expression:
![]()
It is required to add energy to transfere the electron from circular orbit into the infinity
![]()
where ν
а - the frequency of rotation of the electron around the nucleus. The same picture can be observed when removing the electron from the elliptical orbit![]()
where Va/, Vn/ – velocities of the electron in the apocenter and pericenter, l/ – the length of the big axis of the ellipse. Correlations were used at the last formula [1]
![]()

.
Thereby, for circular and for elliptical orbits the following expressions are acceptable:
![]()
![]()
The Spiral wave (the photon) is described by the formula of a flat wave, since the variable value ц (the angular offset of the aether) depends only on the time
t and the coordinates x in the direction the wave spreading. Wave equation is of the form![]()
The answer to this equation is a correlation
![]()
where
2π is an angular amplitude of the spiral wave, ω - an angular frequency. Thereby, when transfering the electron in an atom from the upper orbit to the lower one, only one photon is radiated. This confirms the above mentioned formulae and calculations on these formulae and the experiment data [2].The scientific result is that we have greatly increase the possibility of basic research into the process of the wave radiation of atoms and the spreading of waves in the aether. So, for instance, it is possible to approximately measure the sizes of the photon. The length of the photon, radiated by the atom of hydrogen when transfering the electron from the second orbit to the first one is equal to a wavelength of
λ’=1215.6683·10-10m. Formula (4) can be written as follows,![]()
As shown in work [1], the mass
of the airwaves mф, agitated by the photon is equl to the mass of the electron. In regard to this it is possible to find the amplitude velocity of the spiral wave,![]()
Putting the value in the formula V1’=2.1865006
× 106 m s-1 and V2’=1.0932285× 106 m s-1 [1], we find Vф=1,8940932× 106 m s-1. Energy of the photon is,![]()
The Period of the radiated wave (photon) is,
![]()
Thence we find,
![]()
Placing the known values in the formula we get,
rф=1,2224071× 10-10 m. So the spiral wave (thephoton) has a length
λ’=1215,6683× 10-10 m and a diameter of 2rф=2,444481429× 10-10 m. Ethereal waves are transverse. Knowing the density of the aether с=1080 kg/m3 [1], it is possible to define its magnitude of the shift![]()
For comparison we shall bring importance of the magnitude of the shift of ferric G=0.9
× 105 MPa [3]. The aether consists of electrons and protons. The mass of the proton is 1836 times greater than the mass of the electron. Due to its high inertia, the protons do not practically take part in the transmission of the wave energy. The main carriers of energy in the aether are electrons.Our theory allows us to solve Obler's paradox. The German astronomer Obler, in 1826 has shown that if the amount of stars in the universe is infinite the night sky must be very bright and not dark as we actually see it. The reason for this paradox is an unsatisfactory analysis of the phenomena. Any star radiates a limited amount of photons, which are scattered from all sides in a rectilinear path. The farther from the watcher a star is, the less photons fall into the lens of the telescope. We do not see the distant stars, since the photons radiated by them do not fall into our instruments. To concentrate a greater amount of photons on the focus of the telescope lens, it is necessary to e
nlarge its diameter and to enlarge the time of the exposition while taking pictures. This will let us see more distant stars. If we manage to count the number of stars Q0 and Qx accordingly in a volume of the universe 4/3 рR03 and 4/3рRx3, where R0 - a distance of the most distant stars in the explored part of the universe then according to the formula![]()
it will be possible to define a new value of the radius of the sphere, which is available to the watcher after the increase of the diameter of the lens and the time of exposure.
The Literature
1. Sukhorukov I., Sukhorukov V. I., Sukhorukov E.G., Sukhorukov R. Real physical world without paradoksov. - a Publishers of the Fraternal technical university, 2001.
2. R. V. Floor. The Optics and atomic physics - M.: "Science", 1966.
3. V. S. Zolotorevskiy. The Mechanical characteristic metal - M.: "Metallurgy", 1983.