All Submissions | J. Saba Submissions | Physics Site Links | Home Page |
| Email: James Saba |

GSJ: Received June 4-5, 2005:
http://wbabin.net/saba/saba49.htm
Identifying Proteins which Stereoselectively Bind a Drug via a Cell Surface Expression Library
James Saba
In a previous paper (1), the use of support-affixed protein libraries in the isolation of proteins which selectively bind to one non-conjugated radioactive molecule was described. The use of scintillation proximity and photographic emulsions were the means of detecting the library member which binds.
The ability to use non-conjugated molecules is especially important for small synthetic organic molecules, especially drugs and candidates thereof, which cannot be or cannot easily be conjugated.
Herein is disclosed the use of cell surface display libraries in similar processes, as exemplified in Figure 1.

Therein we contact a cell surface display library with a multitude of identical radioactive chiral molecules, which could be racemic or only one stereoisomer. After a multitude of the radioactive molecules are bound by the cell expressing a binding protein, the cells are spun down onto a glass slide layered with photographic emulsion. Alternatively the cells could be spun down, resuspended in a photographic emulsion, and then the mixture layered on a glass slide.
Subsequent to microscopically identifying the radioactive molecule-binding cell, it is isolated with a micromanipulator and its DNA amplified and sequenced. If the isolated cell is still viable it of course can be grown. If when isolating a labeled cell, the picking process includes nonlabeled neighbors, the process in Figure 1 can be repeated with the small set of library members less densely arrayed.
A similar process utilizing scintillation proximity would involve spinning the cells down on an appropriately layered surface.
Well known is the use of support-conjugated molecules as affinity supports to isolate members of encoded libraries, particular phage-display libraries. Interestingly however, a quick search of MedLine indicates that use of soluble conjugated small molecules in the screening of encoded libraries, especially cell-surface or particle-based protein libraries may not be known. This may be particularly true wherein the small molecules used in the screening are unnatural organic synthetics, a group which includes the vast majority of drug and drug candidates. Labels which could be conjugated to a molecule include those which are radioactive (including single atoms such as tritium); mass spectrometry labels; and fluorescent dyes as exemplified in Figure 2.

Therein we contact the cell-surface display library with a multitude of identical fluorescent dye-conjugated molecules. Alternatively to using a fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS), cells could be spun down on a glass slide after, or prior to contacting with fluorescent conjugate, then identified microscopically.
Molecules of interest could alternatively be conjugated to affinity tags, which allow for several different kinds of isolation and detection schemes. Such tags are even useful for encoded libraries other than cells or particles, such as phage-display or cis-display libraries. Examples of such tags include biotin (recognized by avidin or antibody), and a facilitator of host cell binding and infection.
The use of the soluble conjugated molecules in protein library screening avoids interactions of the library proteins with a support, and the need for eluting bound library member proteins from the support.
In the screening processes depicted in Figures 1 and 2 we utilized single cells. However, it is conceivable that each cell could be first randomly positioned on or within a partitioned or nonpartitioned growth media and then clonally expanded to produce microcolonies.
The cells in the processes described in Figures 1 and 2, could be replaced with particles (beads) affixed to library member proteins, preferably fabricated via a cis-expression process.
Lastly it has been appreciated that, just as a particle, a cell expressing a target-specific surface protein could be directly used in the isolation of the target, as shown in Figure 3.

Of course any molecule could be isolated by the process in Figure 3.
A process similar to Figure 3 except using recombinant phage displaying identical surface proteins can be envisioned.
Various means of separating cells or phage from supernatant could be utilized. For example filtration; polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation; or the use of supports to which phage or cells are affixed prior to or subsequent to binding target molecule.
This invention is considered valuable and a US patent application is anticipated to be filed in the very near future. However, it is hoped that others with laboratory facilities will investigate its full potential, perhaps even to establish a collaboration with the inventor.
The following condensed provisional claims are an attempt to encompass important aspects of this invention.
2) A process wherein an encoded library is contacted with a multitude of identical soluble label- or tag-conjugated molecules.
3) The process of 1 or 2 wherein the encoded library is a particle-based or cell surface display library.
4) The process of 1, 2 or 3 utilized in identifying a protein which stereoselectively binds a molecule.
5) The process of 1, 2, 3 or 4 wherein the molecule is a small unnatural synthetic, preferably a drug candidate or drug.
6) A process of screening an encoded or microarrayed library which utilizes scintillation proximity.
7) A process of screening an encoded or microarrayed library, which utilizes an isotope-sensitive emulsion.
8) The process of 6 or 7 wherein the encoded library is a particle-based or cell surface display library.
9) A process of isolating a molecule from a heterogeneous mixture of molecules, comprising
ii) separating cells or phage from supernatant.
2) Radioactive labels: autoradiography and choice of
emulsions for in situ hybridization.
Brady, et al
(1990) In: In Situ Hybridization: Principle and
Practice (J. M. Polak & J. O'D. McGee eds.) Oxford
University Press.
3) Measurement of radioligand binding by scintillation
proximity assay.
Berry, et al Methods Mol Biol.
2005;306:121-37
4) Flow cytometric screening of yeast surface display
libraries.
Feldhaus, et al Methods Mol Biol.
2004;263:311-32.
5) Yeast cell-surface display--applications of
molecular display.
(review) Kondo, et al Appl
Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004 Mar;64(1):28-40
6) Development of combinatorial bioengineering using
yeast cell surface display--order-made design of cell
and protein for bio-monitoring.
Shibasaki, et al
Biosens Bioelectron. 2003 Nov 15;19(2):123-30
7) Development of an optimized expression system for
the screening of antibody libraries displayed on the
Escherichia coli surface.
Daugherty, et al Protein
Eng. 1999 Jul;12(7):613-21
8) Anchored periplasmic expression, a versatile
technology for the isolation of high-affinity
antibodies from Escherichia coli-expressed libraries.
Harvey, et al Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jun
22;101(25):9193-8
9) Separation of E. coli expressing functional
cell-wall bound antibody fragments by FACS.
Fuchs, et
al Immunotechnology. 1996 Jun;2(2):97-102
10) Epitope mapping and affinity purification of
monospecific antibodies by Escherichia coli cell
surface display of gene-derived random peptide
libraries.
Christmann, et al J Immunol Methods. 2001
Nov 1;257(1-2):163-73
11) Production and fluorescence-activated cell sorting
of Escherichia coli expressing a functional antibody
fragment on the external surface.
Francisco, et al
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Nov 15;90(22):10444-8
12) Bacterial phage receptors, versatile tools for
display of polypeptides on the cell surface.
Etz, et
al J Bacteriol. 2001 Dec;183(23):6924-35
13) Directed evolution of soluble single-chain human
class II MHC molecules.
Esteban, et al J Mol Biol.
2004 Jun 25;340(1):81-95
14) A cell surface display system using novel
GPI-anchored proteins in Hansenula polymorpha.
Kim,
et al Yeast. 2002 Sep 30;19(13):1153-63
15) Flow cytometric quantification of
surface-displayed recombinant receptors on
staphylococci.
Andreoni, et al Biotechniques. 1997
Oct;23(4):696-702, 704
16) Affinity maturation of Fab antibody fragments by
fluorescent-activated cell sorting of yeast-displayed
libraries.
van den Beucken, et al FEBS Lett. 2003
Jul 10;546(2-3):288-94
17) Application of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to
the microscopically identified cells on the slides:
evaluation of specificity and sensitivity of single
cell PCR.
Teramoto, et al Acta Med Okayama. 1994
Aug;48(4):189-93
18) A novel single cell PCR assay: detection of human
T lymphotropic virus type I DNA in lymphocytes of
patients with adult T cell leukemia.
Miyagi, et al
Leukemia. 1998 Oct;12(10):1645-50
19) Single cell PCR in laser capture microscopy.
Hahn, et al Methods Enzymol. 2002;356:295-301
An interesting cell expression system entitled,
Isolation of high-affinity ligand-binding proteins by
periplasmic expression with cytometric screening
(PECS).
Chen, et al Nat Biotechnol. 2001
Jun;19(6):537-42
expands the kinds of cell expression systems useful for this invention. Indeed it now seems likely that even cytoplasmically expressed protein which selectively bind the radioligand could be utilized.