Christos A. Tsolkas

Submissions | Add Your Comments | Physics Site Links | Home Page

Christos A. Tsolkas

Christos Tsolkas, Mar. 4, 2008:

THE FUNDAMENTAL N-BODY LAW
LAW: A closed N-body system (N ≥2) which under the influence of its internal gravitational forces moves at a time t (t>0) from a state A over to another state B (A → B), then the interval run by each body, its speed, acceleration, momentum, etc. are at all times a function of this body’s mass.

The above law is verified:

1. In the two-body problem (N=2), such as in the following cases:
a. In the free-fall of a body within the gravitational field of another one.
b. In the movement of double stars.
c. In the movement of a planet around the Sun, etc.

2. In the three-body problem (N=3), such as in the following cases:
a. The problem of Fig.1,(see, ) according to the two proofs referred to above.
b. The three-body (planet) system, e.g. Mercury-Venus-Earth, etc

3. In the N-body problem, such as in the following cases:
a. The solar system (N=10)
b. The movement of stars inside a galaxy, etc.

As it can be observed, Galileo’s Pisa Experiment is a partial case of the fundamental N-body law stated above. Thus, assuming that Galileo let e.g. two bodies of different mass fall freely from the top of the Tower of Pisa, then N=3 in the above fundamental law (the third body is the Earth).

If, for example, Galileo let four bodies of different mass fall freely in the same way, then N=5 in the above fundamental law. Also, if he let four bodies of different mass fall freely in the same way, then N=101 in the above fundamental law, and so forth…..

Therefore, according to the fundamental N-body law, in all the above cases the bodies will fall towards the Earth at a different speed, acceleration, momentum, etc, and they will never fall at the same speed as Galileo wrongly asserts. Consequently, after everything stated above, it is quite clear that the Galileo’s “law of free fall” is wrong and apparently the “equivalence principle” (weak and strong equivalence principle) of the General Theory of Relativity is also a totally erroneous principle of physics.

Christos Tsolkas, Dec. 7, 2007:

To begin with, I am truly saddened, because a large number of physicists (university professors, researchers, etc) are so blind, that they fail to see and understand the following:

1. Galileo was wrong (the Tower of Pisa Experiment). Therefore, the “equivalence principle” of the General Theory of Relativity (which, as we all know, is based on Galileo’s experiment) is obviously wrong, too.

2. The advance of Mercury’s perihelion (43''/century)is due to the Sun’s revolution around the center of mass of the solar system, and not to the curvature of space-time around the Sun, as Einstein erroneously asserts.

3. By conducting the J.P. Cedarholm - C.H. Townes experiment (1959) (a simple, low-cost experiment) on a moving vehicle, one can automatically establish whether Ether exists in nature or not. Question: Why isn’t this simple yet important Physics experiment carried out?

4. By conducting the “double-slit” experiment DS - e - 727 - 0,1 - 2,a simple, low-cost experiment), one can automatically establish whether Quantum Mechanics is an accurate or erroneous theory of Physics. Question: Why isn’t this simple yet important Physics experiment carried out?

After everything stated above:
What do the “great” physicists (e.g. of Princeton University, MIT, Harvard University, etc) answer to the above queries (1), (2),(3), (4)?

Personally, I believe that if there is a physicist who keeps silent or is unable to answer the above , then this person not only is not regarded a scientist but is also a shame for the very science of physics.

This type of physicists who keep silent to such important issues, in reality put a halt to the evolution of Physics and help sustain a “new Middle Ages”.

Today it is a fact that research work in physics is turning into a craze. A typical example is the performance of the Gravity Probe-b experiment. The cost of this experiment was 200 million dollars. In my opinion, the Gravity Probe-b experiment is the biggest nonsense perpetrated by the “great” physicists in the history of physics for the following reasons:

With the amount of money spent for the Gravity Probe-b experiment, the scientific community could have performed 1.000 simpler and more reliable experiments in order to establish the accuracy of the theory of relativity. If that isn’t a huge nonsense, then what is it?

I am certain that this fact will go down in the history of physics as such, and future physicists will laugh at the nonsense of today’s “great” scientists, universities, etc!!!

Conclusion:
Present-day Physics is a pseudo-physics (I firmly believe in that). The significant scientific work of many anonymous physicists is shrugged off by various major “centers” (universities, college professors, scientific journals, etc).

Physics today resembles an immense madhouse; it has turned into a profit-making supermarket, let alone the propaganda accompanying various theories and the star system established among various physicists. I don’t want to believe that modern research is controlled and driven by several “centers” (universities, college professors, scientific journals, etc).

However, if this is true, then it is the most hideous shame for science itself. Modern research in physics lacks totally the fundamental way of thinking adopted by the ancient Greek philosophers and Galileo.

The pure, simple and deep way of thinking such as that of Eratosthenes, Aristarchus, Newton, Fizeau, Fresnel, Rutheford, Planck, etc, has eclipsed from modern physics.

Modern physics speaks of “space-times”, “loops”, “strings”, “superstrings”, “wormholes”, “indeterminacies”, "quarks", etc. Excuse me for saying this, but all the above is pure nonsense, and figments of the imagination that bear no relation to physics.

Finally, the only thing that the “industries of Quantum Mechanics, the General Theory of Relativity, the theory of strings, etc” do is to constantly produce “materials” for the building of modern Physics’ “Tower of Babel”! The victims in this situation are the young people and mostly students whose fresh mind has been turned into a “garbage can” for the products of the above industries.

I keep wondering about this:

So much money is spent every year in experimental research throughout the world:

1. Is it so difficult to carry out one of the 10 experiments proposed in my paper so as to verify the Theory of Relativity?
2. Is it so difficult to carry out one of the 7 experiments proposed in my paper so as to verify Quantum Mechanics?

I don’t know what to say! To this day, such a thing has never occurred in the history of physics!! Why do the “major” universities, research centers, etc, refuse to perform one of the above 17 experiments? Could it be because these “major” universities wish to preserve (for self-evident reasons) the “mummy” of the Theory of Relativity and of Quantum Mechanics which have already been dead?

I am truly amazed!!

Yet, I feel compelled to inform the “great” physics professors, the major universities, etc, that they turn a blind eye where my case is concerned, and that the answer will come from true and genuine researchers, and quite soon no less!

All the above is definitely not physics. It is the theater of the absurd!! This is an appalling situation!!

Christos Tsolkas, Nov. 16, 2007:

COMPLAINT

Today, various "great Physicists", Universities, reviews, forums, etc are absolutely responsible for "blocking" the evolution of Physics. Unfortunately, all the above have led Physics to a "Middle Age" for the following simple reasons:

A. RELATIVITY THEORY

1. As it is known, huge amounts of money have been spent for the verification of the Relativity Theory, for instance 200,000,000 dollars for the Gravity Probe B experiment and the results obtained are being questioned! Experiment Gravity Probe b, is a great foolishness of Physicists. On the contrary, with small amounts of money, if the experiments suggested on www.tsolkas.gr are performed, and especially experiments (4) and (9), it will immediately be proven that the Relativity Theory is a false theory in Physics.

2. The sun, as well as the planets, revolve around the mass center of our solar system, and this is absolutely valid. Why do all these "great Physicists" and Universities not mention, what is the perihelion shift of the planet Mercury, owing to the sun's rotation, around the mass center of our solar system? see, http://www.tsolkas.gr/english/document1/proof-perihlion/proof-perihlion.html

3. The Equivalence Principle of the General Theory of Relativity is absolutely false because Galileo was wrong (Experiment of the Tower of Pisa is absolutely wrong), see, http://www.tsolkas.gr/english/document1/principle-equivalence/principle-equivalence.html

4. If the J. P. Cedarholm – C. H. Townes Experiment (1959) is carried out exactly as it is on a moving vehicle (e.g. on an automobile, train, etc) then it will be instantly proven whether Ether exists in Nature or not. Unfortunately, this very simple Physics experiment has never been conducted to this day and this is a great error on the part of physicists!!!

Why, therefore, isn`t this very simple Physics experiment performed so as to demonstrate once and for all whether Ether exists in Nature or not?

Question: Could there be a reason for its not being carried out?
Question: Why don't these "great" Physicists and Universities answer these basic questions?

B. QUANTUM MECHANICS

1. Quantum Mechanics is absolutely false, because: If the (6) experiments suggested on http://www.tsolkas.gr/english/document1/gravital-4/gravital-4.html are performed, and especially experiment "The two-slit experiment with electrons" (Experiment DS - e - 727 -0,1 - 2), (which costs little amount of money), it will immediately be proven that Quantum Mechanics is an absolutely false theory of Physics!!! This is related to the fact that the matter has only particle properties and never properties of matter and wave as it is falsely suggested by Quantum Mechanics. In nature, there is absolute causality.

Question: Why don"t the "great Physicists" and Universities perform the above (6) experiments (and especially experiment "The two-slit experiment with electrons" (Experiment DS - e - 727 -0,1 - 2) ) in order to prove whether Quantum Mechanics is a correct or false theory of Physics?

CONCLUSION Today, all the supposedly great Universities and Physicists or Scientific Reviews, forums, etc have blocked the evolution of Physics and led it to a "New Middle Age". This fact will be written in the black books of the History of Physics and all these gentlemen bear great responsibility for blocking Physics.

Unfortunately, today's evolution of Physics is guides and controlled by various "centers" (Professors, Universities, Scientific Reviews, forums etc). Physics, today, instead of being a true science, has been turned into a pseudo-science and also a great propaganda of the Theories of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. Physics, today, aims to satisfy purposes of various "centers" that are more ideological and financial than scientific, which have the main purpose to seek the TRUTH. Why doesn"t the significant scientific work of numerous unknown researchers come before the footlights?

I am personally and deeply sorry for the wrong course that Physics has taken today. All the "great Physicists" , Universities, Scientific Reviews etc should know that it is pointless to block the evolution of Physics, because the TRUTH can never be hidden and distorted. The TRUTH in Physics will shine and this will happen really soon! It is a shame for all these ?great? Physicists, Universities and Scientific Reviews that have led Physics to a "New, Black Middle Age".

All the above (Professors, Universities, Scientific Reviews, forums, etc) will defend themselves in the "Court of Physics" and will certainly be "punished". This is absolutely certain and will happen really soon.

The "Old Physics" (Galileo, Newton, Einstein, Quantum Mechanics) is WRONG.
The "New Physics" (RIGHT and TRUE ) is here: www.tsolkas.gr

Christos Tsolkas, Nov. 6, 2007:

GALILEO'S EXPERIMENT AND PRINCIPLE OF EQUIVALENCE FREE FALL OF BODIES 3-body problem (special case)

According to the Newton's Mechanics:
Let us consider a mass M of radius Ro. At a distance h from the center of this mass M, we place a spherical shell (e.g a spherical elevator) of mass m1 and radius R. Moreover, at the center of the spherical shell we place another point mass m2, (m1 ≠ m2).

Now t= 0 (Phase I), we allow these three masses m1, m2, M to move freely under the influence of the force of universal attraction. Let us also assume that after a time dt (Phase II), v1, v2 and V are respectively the velocities of masses m1, m2 and M, relative to an inertial observer O. Note:Masses m1, m2, and M are considered to be homogeneous and absolutely solid bodies. In addition, velocities v1, v2 and V are considered to be positive numbrs (that is, only the meters of their magnitudes are taken into account), while mass m2 is considered to be found always within the spherical shell (spherical elevator) m1.

The basic question that is being raised is the following:

QUESTION:
At what velocities do masses m1 (spherical elevator) and m2 (point mass) fall in the gravitational field of Mass M once simultaneously dropped in free fall from a height h, namely at the time dt>0 we have u1 = u2 or u1 ≠ u2?

As it is well-known, Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity postulates the following:
“Gravitational fields have the remarkable property of imparting the same acceleration to all bodies independent of their material composition and amount of mass”. (See THE PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY, BY A. EINSTEIN – H.A LORENTZ – H. MINKOWSKI – H. WEYL, Page 114 DOVER PUBLICATIONS, INC). Einstein based this conclusion on the all-too-familiar Galileo’s experiment (the experiment conducted from the Leaning Tower of Pisa).

Also, I have a very basic question:
QUESTION: If, m1 = 10^6 tn (mass a white dwarf) , m2 = 1gr (mass a feather), and the mass M of Earth is e.g M = 10^6 tn , namely m1 = M, then according to Galileo's experiment, (experiment of the Tower of Pisa) we have again u1 = u2?

I await your anwer on the above two questions.

Jun. 26, 2006 Ali A Faraj:
Your paper http://www.tsolkas.gr/english/document1/proof-perihlion/proof-perihlion.html is technically robust and very interesting. It has satisfied my early comments ( http://www.wbabin.net/comments/faraj.htm). and, in my view, its the correct explanation for the anomalous advance of Planet Mercury.

As for your questions to the world's universities, the quickest way to get a response is to submit your article for publication in Physical Review D (http://prd.aps.org/). Getting it published there is not very important. What is important is to have a feedback from a well-qualified referee in the field. But before you get in touch with the experts, your paper must satisfy the editor, i.e. it must have the appropriate format and its sources and references must be fully documented.

Its almost certain that the first objections of the reviewer to your paper are going to be in the form of counter questions.

(1) How do you know that Urbain Leverrier (http://www.bun.kyoto-u.ac.jp/phisci/Gallery/leverrier_note.html) did not take into account the orbital rotation of the sun?

(2) On what basis do you believe that the shape and the size of the solar orbit are unknown? Check this out (http://science.howstuffworks.com/question316.htm).

(3) Why do you think the classical perturbations do not include the effects of the sun's revolution around the center of the Solar System?

(4) How can you be sure that you have gotten it right?

Therefore, you have to make a thorough critical review of previous works on the subject, and to append that to your original paper.

Jun. 25, 2006, C. A. Tsolkas:
The difference of 43´´/century with astronomic observations as regards the advance of Mercury’s perihelion is not attributed to the curvature of space-time around the Sun, as the Theory of Relativity erroneously maintains.

The 43´´/century of the advance of Mercury’s perihelion (as demonstrated above) is due to the revolution of the Sun around the center of mass of our Solar system, a fact that until today has never been taken into account when calculating the advance of Mercury’s perihelion. Finally, after everything discussed in this paper, the Theory of Relativity should be unquestionably deemed erroneous. more at: http://www.tsolkas.gr/english/document1/proof-perihlion/proof-perihlion.html

FOUR QUESTIONS ON THE ADVANCE OF MERCURY'S PERIHELION

1. At what distance (in Km) does the Sun's center of mass lie from the center of mass of our solar system?

2. What kind of movement does the Sun perform around the center of mass of our solar system (circular, elliptical, etc) and what are the particulars of this orbit?

3. How much time (period, in years) does the Sun need to make a complete revolution around the center of mass of our solar system?

4. To what extent (expressed in ° degrees) does the Sun's movement (around the center of mass of our solar system) contribute to the advance of Mercury's perihelion?

What answers have the various universities, physicists, etc, given to the above questions? Any comments would be appreciated.