May 8, 2008:
I read the article http://wbabin.net/mathis/mathis33.pdf and I was pleased to find in it a careful and truthful representation of the lamentable present situation in physics. It could not have been better explained….

As mentioned in that paper, the maths necessary in physics are simple and must remain so, since the risk is that one can lose contact with the physical reality and judging from my personal experience in base of the results which I reached in this field, the mathematical skills learned in function of my engineering background were enough. To me, the purpose of "the restricted relativity" which consider conditions of observation in absence of gravitational interaction between gravitational systems, is the description of the universal reality in real time and the minimum necessary requirement is the deduction from basic data, empirically available through measurements of light signals received, of the geometric simultaneity of existence of the objects observed (to the determination of simultaneity, the temporal phenomena can be added, and since the objects observed are usually large gravitational masses , the physical characters of these masses and the internal transformations caused by their own gravity should be added as well). The solution, in absence of gravitational interaction, lies on the revision of the Lorentz's graphics and in the correct interpretation of Lorentz's transformations.

Note: I refer myself to the paper, http://wbabin.net/physics/ruggeri7.pdf that contained my "mysterious" DELINEATIO MIRABILIS.

When we come to presence of gravity ("general relativity") the distances prevailing inside a gravitational system (like our solar system), are definitely shorter than the sidereal distances prevailing between gravitational systems, and we observe the system directly since the Doppler Effect is very limited and can be overlooked, what cannot be overlooked is the geometric effect caused by the Precession and the internal temporal effects in the object observed (the one due to precession and the other due to time retardation.

Therefore in this case we must concentrate on the effects of geometric nature, that the gravity induces on the orbital movements and on the evaluation of temporal effects and also deduct the internal transformations of mass-energy, inside the objects in orbit, also caused by the gravity of the central mass,.

Now the results are clear to me why the "entente" is so busy in supporting the Big-bang. Of course! it is a theory which lends them the opportunity to model the universe through mathematical transformation of systems purely geometric (upholding the idea of vacuum), a feat not possible if one accepts the hypothesis of random presence of physical masses inside an infinite Euclidean space, filled of substance which sustains the dynamic cycle which gives to these masses, birth maturity and eventually leads to their physical death, through presence of absorption at the beginning and dissipation at the end, of this substance, by the physical masses themselves.

I firmly concur that the physic discipline does not need mathematics "per se" but can make use of them in limited extent, since what is mostly required is intuition of the physical problems. Let us hope that eventually the "entente" of the mathematicians realizes that their theories have reached the limit of pretense and develop enough consciousness and self respect, making impossible for them to carry on with their ploys in a field in which unless they show and use a good intuitive capacity, their presence should be restricted to their useful cooperation.

Sep. 14, 2007:
Along the years of residence in Johannesburg I developed an insatiable appetite for the problems of physics and not long ago I reached a stage that I would define, mature, in this field. Deprived as I am of contacts I worked in the realm of pure speculation and I am presently satisfied of my results. I do not intend to bother anybody with the full weight of my theory, my only purpose in sending this short attachment is to create interest. The reason being that my readings are convincing me that the field of Knowledge of the Nature of things generally defined "Relativity " not only ,at present, lacks definition of intent but is in an extreme status of confusion and lamentations cannot help to superate the impasse.

The formulations used by the scientists are the fruit of good intuitions mainly in the mathematic field and imagination and wild speculations have replaced the lack of a solid search intended to discover what is going on at the base of the physical phenomena. I can add that good ideas in physics can improve the life of millions and that was the purpose I had in mind all the time.

Some of the requirements defining a true theory....

Listed below are requirements that are necessary in order to define a true theory ( but not all of them ).
· A true theory is based on substance, the Ether, occupying the Euclidean space and considers transformations-degradations along a cycle starting with the Ether transformed into mass, generating a field of depression inside the Ether, ( called gravitational field) which reacts with the mass immersed inside the Ether and produces coexisting transformations-degradations associated with release of Spin and generation of movements, ending up with the dissipation of the mass that results absorbed by the Ether through interaction.
· - must respect the principle of conservation, but this does not affects the majority of the physicists, since with the assumption that Ether does not exists, they are exempted from the obligation to respect this principle and pretend to be able to do very well.
· - must justify physically Static Force and Starter Force with the development of the appropriate transformation-degradation.
· - must justify Precession through the appropriate transformation-degradation.
· - must justify how the atom comes into existence inside the Ether to which I gave the alternate name Energized Space Fabric ( ESF )
· - must justify what gravity does to the atoms when compressions (due to Static Forces ) affects the atomic structure ( permitting the development of the formula justifying the value of dissipation from a large mass ).
· - must reconcile through a set of explanations and related formulae, all the transformations-degradations due to gravity inside any mass including those inside the Large Gravitational Mass (LGM) inside the system.
· - must justify that the Precession observed in the movement of the planet Mercury is a phenomenon affecting all the masses in orbit around a LGM and explains together with the relativistic time delay the phenomenon of the GPS .
· - is recognizable, when simple new formulations produce advances through the use of known and tested simple basic effects, formulae, graphics etc... such as, the principle of conservation, Newton's ULG, Einstein's Law of equivalence, Lorentz's diagram, Doppler's effect etc.. (all of them opportunely interpreted ).
· - must consider that measurements of distances and velocities inside an Universe, definitely Euclidean, can be made through geometric reference and when velocities must be measured is necessary to have a geometric reference and use a precise clock on condition that the experiment can be repeated. Measurements of distances and velocities can also be made through values of mass-energy in dissipation received by the instruments available to us but the readings must be interpreted and corrected, before being accepted as measurements of distances.
· A true theory, measures transformation-degradation through the concept of time and this is obtained fixing the time inside a system, the measure of time inside a system is related to it and the Observer inside the system ( any system ) perceives the time in invariable fashion.
The most precise and recent atomic clocks, like the pendulum of old, are measuring phenomena related to the transformations-degradations affecting the gravitational mass of which they are made. In case the system is subjected to change of velocity the increase of inertial mass affects the Local Clock as well as all the physical phenomena and time measurements made by an Observer inside the system, remain invariable. Therefore an Observer (who is a conscious being living inside the system) whose physical phenomena are affected in the same manner as the whole world around him, cannot detect changes to his own reality caused by variation of content of inertial mass ( tied up to variation of velocity as well ).
· Lots of other conditions I am aware of and I have registered in my theory and they satisfy me that I have made an advancement, worthy of consideration.

Note : I can refer to the Michaelson-Morley experiment as the one confirming that the speed of light inside a system in movement is constant ,( is c for the Observer inside the system and c' = (c2-v2)^½ for an external Observer in relative condition of quiet, where v is the relative velocity measured through instruments measuring the characters of the dissipation) . I do not see how there can be Ether wind within a phenomenon of interaction Mass-Ether, in which the mass-energy DMc² present in the gravitational mass through transformations-degradations is impeded to reach the maximum velocity c in the Ether/ESF because is attached to the Mass. As consequence, in the space containing the Ether/ESF, instead of having a DMc² moving freely at c speed in a fixed direction (dissipating at c speed ) we have a mass M moving at v0 speed under the effect of presence of a Total Force FT= DMc² inside it , the value DMc² is mass-energy and inside the mass M is equivalent to a mass inertial DM which is the one type of mass able to retard the physical phenomena ( v0 = orbital velocity in a perfectly circular orbit ) :

FT = DMc² = M v0²

The formulations based on the presence of the Ether respect the conservation principle and successfully overcome the shortcomings presently faced with the use of the ToR of Einstein .